Essays
& Speeches
A Men's Rights
Movement Viewpoint on Rape Laws, Policies and Related Issues
Anthony Nazzaro, to Fordham School of Law, April 9, 1998 My
purpose today is to familiarize you with a men's rights movement
viewpoint on current rape laws, policies and other related issues.
False rape accusations
One of the most controversial
topics today is false rape accusations.
Myth: False rape accusations
do no significant harm to an innocent victim.
Fact: A false rape accusation has the potential to destroy
an innocent man's life emotionally as well as financially.
Myth: False rape accusations
against men are rare.
Fact: Even the disputed 8.6% figure given by the FBI is
three to four times the false report rate when compared to all the
other crime categories.
Myth: Actively prosecuting
false rape accusations would expose women to prosecution whenever
the man is acquitted.
Fact: Prosecution of false accusations under existing law
covering perjury and malicious prosecution would require clear and
convincing evidence that the woman deliberately lied. Such
evidence can only exist if the woman did indeed deliberately
fabricate the charge. No such evidence could exist if the woman
were truly raped or believed herself raped.
Some possible reasons for a false
accusation are:
- Revenge, because of rejection
- Extortion or blackmail
- Protection of reputation (of a
married or underage woman)
- Jealousy (having an obsessive
attraction)
- Or, a reinterpretation of
consensual sex for any number of reasons
The unspoken crime of prison rape
It is shameful that prison rape is not prosecuted more today
with all that we have discovered about learned abusive behavior.
Prison rape is not usually even included in commonly used rape
statistics. Many people believe there isn't a public outcry because
it involves male prisoners whom most believe are getting what they
deserve. It is the worst kind of sexual violence because, being of a
homosexual nature, it additionally carries with it the devastation
of violating the victim's sexual preference. Stephen Donaldson,
president of "Stop Prisoner Rape" in an op/ed article in The
New York Times, stated, "We set in motion a truly vicious
cycle of sex abusers who one day will return to our communities and
victimize our citizens."
Marital rape law
New York State should have kept its spousal sexual assault law
written as it was, that it is only rape when the perpetrator is not
married to the victim. The charges should be aggravated assault or
spousal sexual assault which carry the lesser charge of misdemeanor,
rather than the more severe felony rape charge. An actual letter
from a man serving many years in a Boise, Idaho prison stated,
"I can see a woman who is raped by a stranger, that she would
feel totally violated and become traumatized. But a woman who has
had sex with her husband hundreds of times and is forced one night
should either demand he get counseling or divorce him." A
marriage in good standing usually carries with it the expectation of
a mutual sexual relationship and should not be equated with stranger
or acquaintance rape.
Limiting the responsibility to men
Blamelessness, due to drunkenness, is a legal doctrine
which is a woman-only excuse. It holds that a woman who is seduced
after she has been drinking can accuse the man of rape on the
grounds that she was too drunk to know that she was yielding to his
advances, therefore unable to give legal consent. But a man cannot
use the same defense and argue that he couldn't be guilty of sexual
assault because he was too drunk to know what he was doing. If,
however, a woman gets stopped for driving while intoxicated,
charges are filed regardless of her gender. She is held accountable
in this case, but treated like a child when sex is the issue.
Blamelessness, due to low IQ.
A man can be charged with rape because the woman involved had a developmentally-disabled
status that was unbeknownst to him.
Blamelessness, due to multiple
personality disorder. A man can be charged with rape because
he didn't get the consent of all the woman's personalities or the
particular personality in control of her body at the time of
intimacy.
Statutory rape
The unchastity standard should be reinstituted because it
took into account the underage victim's life experience or past
sexual history. Charging Joe Buttafuoco with statutory rape because
Amy Fisher was a month under the legal age is a travesty. It totally
discounted that she had been having sex for years and was actually
paid for it via an escort service. In fact, in a Florida decision,
Judge Jerry Lockett ruled that the same right of privacy that
guaranteed 15-year-old girls the right to have an abortion also
assured them the right to engage in consensual sex without being
considered "jail bait."
Alleged rape victim versus alleged
rapist media disclosure policies
Is it proper for news organizations to name the accused but not
the accuser? The media, which has the power to destroy people's
reputations, should instead recognize our standard of American
justice: That the accused is innocent until proven guilty.
Naming only the accused prejudices the public's opinion by the
implicit assumption that the accuser is a victim whose identity
needs protection while the accused must be guilty in not receiving
any identity protection. Furthermore, concealing an accuser's
identity can tempt unscrupulous or disturbed women into abusing the
criminal justice system. In their attempt to eradicate double
standards, most men's rights organizations demand either disclosure
or non-disclosure of both parties' names because if an alleged rape
victim still has a negative stigma today, being an alleged rapist
must certainly have one also.
Men's reproductive rights
Since the state (since 1996) cannot by law force motherhood upon
women, the state should not be able to force fatherhood upon men. Roe
vs. Wade changed the rules for women, giving them the choice to
deny motherhood. Yet the rules for men remained exactly the same.
Allowing men to have equal reproductive choice would not deny choice
to women. It would only eliminate their expectation of having their
choice financed by men. Karen Decrow, former president of the
National Organization for Women, saw the dilemma that legalized
abortion might eventually mean the end of paternity suits. She
stated while a member of Serpico's defense team, "If women have
the right to choose if they become parents, men should have that
right, too."
AIDS and DNA testing for suspects
We believe in mandatory AIDS and DNA testing for prosecuted rape
suspects. We feel that scientific advancements should be used to
safeguard the victims or prove the guilt in rape cases. Conversely,
we feel that Governor Pataki is signing into law a ban on mandatory
polygraph test when the District attorney feels that the allegation
is suspect. This is wrong.
Our Consensual
Sex Statement has been handed out on many college campuses as a
result of all the date rape accusations of a few years ago. Sex
contracts were discussed on The Maury Povich Show as well as
other talk shows and has been the topic of many newspaper articles.
Another myth about rape that I'd like
to dispel is that sex has nothing to do with rape. Women's
organizations have successfully indoctrinated the public into
believing that rape is about violence and not sex. Quite the
contrary, rape is about sex in both the act and motive.
Violence is the mans of getting what the rapist wants in some cases
and the perverted sexual turn-on in others.
In conclusion, regarding the laws
that govern men and women...Law--good law--should be fair, logical
and gender-neutral in design and application.
Return
to Essays page
Printer-Friendly
Version
|